human stat1 (Addgene inc)
Structured Review

Human Stat1, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human stat1/product/Addgene inc
Average 90 stars, based on 16 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Respiratory viruses activate autophagy via the IFN-STAT1/STAT5B-SOCS1 axis"
Article Title: Respiratory viruses activate autophagy via the IFN-STAT1/STAT5B-SOCS1 axis
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.1101/2025.10.28.685013
Figure Legend Snippet: A, Schematic depiction of the JAK-STAT signaling cascade. First level shows the Type I (red), II (blue) and III (green) IFNs with respective receptors. Second level depicts the receptor-associated kinases (right) Tyrosine kinase 2 (Tyk2), Janus kinase 1 (JAK1), Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) and Janus kinase 3 (JAK) with the respective inhibitors (left) for each kinase. TC JL 37 (TC) inhibits Tyk2, Ruxolitinib (Rux, international nonproprietary name) inhibits JAK1 and JAK2, PF06551600 (PF, international nonproprietary name Ritlecitinib) inhibits JAK3 and CP-690550 (CP, international nonproprietary name Tofacitinib) inhibits JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3. Third level shows exemplary Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT) dimer with STAT proteins (STAT1 to STAT6) listed. Fourth level depicts schematic induction of interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression in the nucleus. B-D , Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) 24 h after treatment with increasing concentrations of IFN-β (B), IFN-γ (C) or IFN-λ1 (D), in presence or absence of TC (100 nM), PF (100 µM), Ruxolitinib (Rux, 100 nM), or CP (100 nM), n = 4 ± SEM (left panels). Area under the curve (AUC) analysis (right panels) of the cumulative autophagy induction. Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. *, p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry
Figure Legend Snippet: A, Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HEK293T autophagy reporter cells (HEK293T GL) transiently expressing Cas9 and at least 2 individual gRNAs against indicated STATs. Treated with 10 pM IFN-β for 24h. n = 4-6± SEM. B, Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) transfected with siRNAs targeting STAT1 , STAT3 , STAT5B or ATG5 and treated with 1 nM IFN-β for 24h. BafA1 (625 µM) or Torin-1 (1 µM) for 4h used as controls. n = 4 ± SEM. C , Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) 24 h after treatment with increasing concentrations of IFN-β in presence or absence of 1 µM 5,15-DPP (STAT3 Inhibitor, STAT3i), 1 µM AS1517499 (STAT6 Inhibitor, STAT6i), 10 µM Fludarabine (STAT1 Inhibitor, STAT1i) or 100 µM STAT5 Inhibitor (STAT5i). n = 4 ± SEM. D, Area under the curve (AUC) analysis of the data in (C). E , Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) 24 h after treatment with increasing concentrations of IFN-γ and STAT5 Inhibitor (STAT5i, 100 µM). n = 4 ± SEM. F , Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) 24 h after treatment with increasing concentrations of IFN λ1 and STAT5 Inhibitor (STAT5i, 100 µM). n = 3 ± SEM. Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. *, p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Techniques Used: Flow Cytometry, Expressing, Transfection
Figure Legend Snippet: A, Representative confocal immunofluorescence images of HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) transiently expressing FLAG-tagged (red) and V5-tagged (yellow) STAT1, STAT3 or STAT5 in combination or FLAG-tagged TRIM32 (scale bar, 10 μm) (left panel). Quantification of the number of autophagosomes (= eGFP-LC3B positive puncta) per cell in the images in the left panel. n= 9-63 cells ± SEM Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. B, Co-immunoprecipitation of FLAG-tagged STAT1 and STAT5B from whole cell lysates of HEK293T cells transiently expressing FLAG-tagged and V5-tagged STAT1 and STAT5B or V5-tagged STAT1 or STAT5B alone. Immunoblots stained with anti-V5, anti-FLAG or anti-GAPDH. C, Exemplary images of Proximity Ligation Assay (PLA) of STAT1 and STAT2 or STAT5B (left panel) in HDF hTERT cells with or without treatment with 1 nM IFN-β for 1h. PLA signal (red). DAPI, nuclei (blue). Quantification of the number of PLA spots per nucleus per image of the left panel with single antibody controls (right panel). n = 15-21 tiles ± SEM. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. D, Representative confocal immunofluorescence images of NHLF cells treated with 1 nM of IFN-β for 1h and stained with α-STAT1 (green) and α-STAT5B (red), and DAPI (blue, nuclei) (scalebar 25 µm). E, Quantification of the ratio of nuclear to cytosolic intensity of STAT1 and STAT5B in the images in (D). n= 19-20 cells ± SEM. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. *, p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001
Techniques Used: Immunofluorescence, Expressing, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Staining, Proximity Ligation Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: A, Heatmap of variance of the top 40 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in HeLa GL cells treated with 1 nM IFN-β vs untreated control (mock vs. IFN-β) as assessed by next generation sequencing. Samples treated with 100 μM STAT5 Inhibitor are indicated. n = 3. B, Deming Correlation Analysis of log2-fold changes of DEGs (mock_vs_IFN-β and mock(iSTAT5)_vs_IFN-β (iSTAT5)) in HeLa GL in (A). Deming (Model II) Linear Regression. C , Quantification of Top20 up- and down-regulated genes by STAT5B (=PC2) of data in (B) by Principal Component Analysis. D, Fold changes of normalized counts of SOCS1 and SLFN5 derived from the data in (A and B). n=3± SEM. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. E , Quantification of gene expression by qRT-PCR of STAT5 regulated genes or ISGs in human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) cells treated with IFN-β (1 nM), STAT5i (250 μM) or both. Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction. F, Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) transfected with siRNAs for RSAD2, SOCS1, ATG5, STAT1 or STAT5B and treated with IFN-β (1 nM, 24h). n = 4 ± SEM. Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. (G), Representative confocal immunofluorescence images of HeLa autophagy reporter cells (HeLa GL) transiently expressing FLAG- or HA-tagged (red) SOCS1, RSAD2 or TRIM32 (scale bar, 10 μm) (left panel). Quantification of the area of autophagosomes (= px 2 of eGFP-LC3B positive puncta) per cell in the images in the left panel. n= 49-140 cells ± SEM. Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. H, Quantification of autophagosome levels by flow cytometry in HEK293T autophagy reporter cells (HEL293T GL) expressing HA-SOCS1, TRIM32-FLAG or treated with Torin-1 (1µM, 4h) or Bafilomycin A1 (625nM, 4h) as positive controls. n= 4 ± SEM, Brown-Forsythe and Welch ANOVA with Dunnett’s T3 multiple comparisons test. *, p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Techniques Used: Control, Next-Generation Sequencing, Derivative Assay, Gene Expression, Quantitative RT-PCR, Flow Cytometry, Transfection, Immunofluorescence, Expressing
